Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2015

The Emancipation of Women



Yesterday I came across a pro hijab post which 

presented that particular head covering as a feminist 

accoutrement intended to free Muslim women from 

being objectified as sex objects.  It was presented 

by an sexy young woman in a hijab and perfect 

makeup.


The next post was Rex Murphy's point of view on the 

National. Rex says the hijab/niqab controversy is a 

tempest in a teacup meant to distract us from the 

real issues of the election.  But that  sweeps the 

political reality of what is happening 

under the rug and ignores the ugly passion 

the topic often generates at the grassroots level.  



Third came a picture of Steven Harper above the 

caption "I would never ask my daughter to cover her 

face because she is a woman."


I don't know if he really said that but if he did, well, 

here's the news Mr. Harper : it isn't about you.



Most disturbing was the last post I saw yesterday 

which depicted women as the enemy. It showed a 

crowd of Muslim women fists raised in anger 

and read (more or less), "You leave your shit 

hole of a country and come here and complain 

because our laws aren't the same as the shit hole

laws you escaped from."   



I don't know what the answer is except to say that 

in a better world the clothes a woman puts on in the 

morning would be of no interest to anyone but 

herself.



The emancipation of the Earth's women will be the 

greatest struggle of the 21st century.  



***

Thursday, March 10, 2011

REAL Women and the F Word


Marlene JenningsImage via Wikipedia
Marlene Jennings


There is a motion that has been put forward by Montreal Liberal MP, Marlene Jennings that would have taxpayers give political parties a few extra bucks based on the percentage of women they manage to get elected to Parliament.

Because I suspect that we are moving into desperate times I am in favour of anything that will get more women into government.


So when I saw that the Niagara Falls Review had posted an article about this Bill, (Bill C-552),  I read it with great interest.

I also read the comments.

I must tell you, my comment was the only one in favour of the motion.

The majority of the comments came from REAL women and I was shocked at how many of them used the 'f' word.



Now my New Year's Resolution was to look for common ground with people and groups whose beliefs make me uncomfortable so I decided to check out REAL Women of Canada, (Realistic, Equal, Active Living).



This is what I found:


"Before women can have equality with men, we must first have equality among ourselves and this means a tolerance and respect for the differing views of other women.

This also means a recognition, not only of the dignity of the individual, but also for the fact that women have always required more than just one voice to speak for our concerns."




Wow! 

I almost took out a lifetime membership.



However REAL Women wants to tighten divorce laws, is not pro-choice in the abortion debate, is homophobic and anti-union, doesn't seem overly sympathetic towards single moms, is against legalizing prostitution, etc. etc.



But what really shocked me was the way they bandied about that darn old 'f' word.



When asked if her organization approved of Ms Jennings' effort to bring more women to Parliament Hill, Gwen Lanolt, representing REAL Women, said, "What they are really saying is that they want more ...



Get ready for the 'f' word...














Feminists!


Gasp.














She added, "And most of these ...



here it comes again ...




Feminists



(gasp again)


don't utter a word that most women would agree with."




What happened to our common ground, Gwen - the part where we tolerate and respect the views of other women and the dignity of individuals?


Jeesh.
























Enhanced by Zemanta